In the world of mixed martial arts, it might come as a surprise—or perhaps provoke some debate—that Ben Askren has publicly expressed his disapproval of Kamaru Usman receiving an immediate shot at the lightweight (welterweight) title against the reigning champion, Islam Makhachev. The reason? Askren believes that Usman’s recent fight history doesn’t justify another title opportunity, especially after only one bout over the past two years. Yet, this story isn’t just about rankings; it’s a compelling narrative of perseverance, legacy, and the shifting landscape of MMA in 2025.
Ben Askren, who made a remarkable recovery from a double-lung transplant—an inspiring medical miracle—has become a voice of experience and perspective in the sport. While it might seem that someone with Askren’s storied background in Bellator and ONE Championship might favor a veteran like Usman getting another shot, he actually advocates for the next generation to step up and claim their opportunities.
During an interview with Helen Yee, Askren clarified his stance, saying, “I know I’ve had issues with him before, so I don’t want to sound biased.” He acknowledged Usman’s long reign as champion but pointed out that his recent performance has left room for doubt. “He’s lost a few fights more recently, and the welterweight belt has changed hands many times. He lost to Leon Edwards, and Edwards lost to Belal Muhammad. Belal was beaten by Jack Della Maddalena, and Maddalena was defeated by Islam Makhachev. This chain of outcomes suggests that Usman’s shot isn’t just about his past—it’s about what recent fighters have accomplished.”
Askren emphasizes that the evolving welterweight division has produced a series of competitive contenders who have earned their chances, rather than simply following name recognition or past achievements. While Usman remained a prominent figure in the UFC during the pandemic— and there’s speculation that the promotion might leverage his popularity to boost upcoming fights for their new broadcast partner, Paramount+—Askren’s focus is on fairness and merit. Despite Usman’s 1-3 record over the last three years, the veteran thinks the newer fighters, who have actually been active and winning, deserve their opportunities.
“I respect that sometimes the ‘favorites’ get the benefit of the doubt, especially with Dana White,” Askren concedes. “But I prefer to see fighters earn their shot. I may not be a huge fan of Ian Garry, but I genuinely believe he has earned his chance. It’ll be interesting to see how these younger guys develop over the next couple of years.”
However, fans should note that most fights involving top contenders are unlikely to occur before April, as the UFC’s schedule is packed until March, when Ramadan begins. During this period, fighters like Makhachev and Khamzat Chimaev are typically in camp, preparing for upcoming bouts. So, the question remains—who do you think should be next in line to challenge Makhachev? The UFC fan community is invited to share their thoughts below!
And here’s where it gets controversial—some might argue that Usman’s past achievements should automatically secure him a title shot, regardless of recent results. But does legacy outweigh current form? Or should fighters be rewarded strictly on recent performances and merit? It’s a debate that fuels the sport’s constantly evolving nature. What’s your take?
